thehelper lag abuser

[Wolverine]

whole game ping over 400-500.he blamed it on server....

[ihatehackerssss]

your ping wasn't exaclty peachy either mister. it was 400 certain times, though most of the time 200. unfortunately, i only have a screen of you with around 150 ping. And EXCUSE ME for not living in europe. ping is naturally higher when you're NOT on that continent.

besides, even if you were the host (in which case i would have quit already since it would be lag), you would have lost. those who watch the replay can see that my army would have beaten yours, lag or no lag.

i understand that the forum administrators will be fair in making this decision. thank you.

[Wolverine]

dude u make me laugh. u post 1 screenshot of me having 142 ping and u having 400 ping and tell admins that "my army would have beaten yours". who can win in a 3-4-5 seconds delay game?

this is not the thing about you having bigger army.the point is that even if we had same armies I COULD NOT MOVE MY UNITS IN TIME . comprende?

and the thing about "excuse me for not living in europe". plsss
i thought this server is called EURO battlenet.seems i was wrong ....

edit: btw my ping was 80-140 dude. if u want i have about 7-8 more screeshots available to prove this so don't lie coz its lame.

[Tito]

i see only 1 valid ss.( first one) cuz need pings of both players cuz server may be lagging.

[Wolverine]

ok did not know that, my bad. here are some more.

edit: "i see only 1 valid ss.( first one)" ...how about his ss? :P

[BLUE_SYSTEM]

thehelper Noted